FierceBiotechFierceBiotechResearchFierceBiotechITFierceVaccinesFiercePharmaFiercePharmaManufacturing   FierceHealthcare

Free Newsletter

About | View Sample | Privacy

Research advocates call for big hike in NIH grants

Can the research community make a case that increased research spending should become part of the upcoming stimulus legislation? The Massachusetts Life Sciences Collaborative thinks so.

In a letter to the state's Congressional group--a set of sympathetic lawmakers that includes Senator Ted Kennedy--the group maintains that for every NIH grant that is awarded, seven new jobs are generated. And the collaborative insists that the math provides solid grounds for significantly increasing the amount of money that pours through the National Institutes of Health and into research labs around the country.

Over the past five years, they say, federal funding has declined 13 percent when adjusted for inflation. Now, only two out of every 10 grant requests are funded. And the shortfall has made life hard for scores of researchers. Another relevant number in their appeal: the average age of a biomedical researcher in the U.S. is 43 and rising.

"The result is a slowdown in scientific progress, a reduction in the new business spin-outs derived from biomedical research and a delay in the delivery of new therapies to patients," says the collaborative. "But, an even more insidious consequence of this erosion of NIH support is the way it has discouraged the next generation of scientific leaders from pursuing careers in biomedical research."

The collaborative is made up of a group of heavy hitters in the research community. It includes Drew Faust, the president of Harvard, UMass President Jack Wilson and Susan Hockfield, the president of MIT. Those universities have attracted millions of research dollars every year.

- check out the report in Mass High Tech

Related Articles:
New NIH chief faces some big challenges
Zerhouni's departure from NIH follows controversial tenure
Warning: flat NIH budget threatens 'dead end'
Dwindling NIH funds triggers research "crisis"
Research groups angry as NIH funding stays flat

More stories about funding   National Institutes of Health  

Comments

Two or so years ago the Institute of Medicine published a report that concluded that the promise of basic research had been broken: the benefits to bedside care had not been realized.

Basic research's response has been a proliferation of centers claiming to be all about translating basic research discoveries into improvements in medicine.

In spite of the christening of many centers of translational medicine, nothing has changed. Basic science continues failing to fulfill its promises.

If NIH grants are primarily a make work program, then maybe increasing the number of grants has some merit in a financial sense.

Better yet, rather than enter this whitecoat welfare system, people should start looking for real and honest work.

The research community is the last bastion of the 'free lunch'.

Most university professors are like little children who are about as responsible with their funding requests and expenditures as the Financial companies which tanked the economy. Couple this with devious college administrators whose sole goal is to grow their colleges, and we have a devil's brew of mis-allocation of resources.

If you want responsible spending on research you must create a new generation of accountable researchers.

YOU MUST ELIMINATE TENURE AND ACTIVELY AUDIT COLLEGE ADMINISTRATIONS!

They are still not addressing the need to raise the yearly stipend/salary of post-doctoral fellows! We have not had an increase in pay for more than 5 years. I person with more than 10 years of formal scientific/medical education and who works ~60 hours a week deserves rescue from poverty.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

To combat spam, please enter the code in the image.