FierceBiotechFierceBiotechResearchFierceBiotechITFierceVaccinesFiercePharmaFiercePharmaManufacturing   FierceHealthcare

Free Newsletter

About | View Sample | Privacy
Related Topics >> R&D spending | R&D

Pfizer's Kindler lays out his vision for R&D teams

Takeda isn't the only big pharma company looking for ways to push scientists into a new, more productive groove. Pfizer CEO Jeff Kindler (photo) has made R&D productivity a key theme. And he sat down with the Wall Street Journal recently to review how R&D teams need to be structured in order to be successful.

First, he said, the teams have to be a manageable size. Say, no bigger than 100 to 150, so they can all fit into one cafeteria. Second, the team leaders, the CSOs, need to be at the top of their field. And, third, they need to be left alone to create a distinctive culture, being evaluated based on their success demonstrating proof of concept.

Given the lengthy timeline involved in new drug development, it will be quite awhile before anyone will be able to judge Pfizer's success. In the meantime, Glaxo is setting up a new R&D structure that requires scientists to compete for money, Sanofi is looking at slashing early-stage research and Merck is retooling its research work after concluding that 75 cents out of every dollar spent in R&D goes to support failure.

You could say that the status quo is no longer acceptable. Welcome to the cafeteria school of research.

- read the story from the Wall Street Journal

Related Articles:
Pharma looks to biotech for R&D model
U.S. R&D headcount tumbles in key categories
NSF crunches the (eroding) numbers on academic R&D
Crisis forces biotechs to cut R&D, preserve cash


SHARE
WITH:
Email Twitter Facebook LinkedIn StumbleUpon
Get Your FREE FierceBiotech Research Email Newsletter:
Comments (1) | Post a comment
More stories about R&D spending   R&D  

Comments

The three points listed by Kindler are excellent, and Pfizer will enjoy considerable success if they can stick to the plan as he describes it.
But there are no new thoughts or concepts here. If the C-suite had bothered to ask - and listen - their R&D scientists they would have heard this at least 20 years ago. My only comment is that the senior leaders of large organizations should be embarrassed for taking so long to articulate what has been so obvious to their own scientists for so many years.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

To combat spam, please enter the code in the image.